The Shiller P/E Ratio

The Shiller P/E ratio is a measure often applied to the US equity market.

Invented by Professor Robert Shiller of Yale University, it is a specific metric that helps investors figure out if a market or company is overvalued or undervalued.

The Schiller P/E ratio is a type of P/E ratio, so why don’t we tackle that first.

What is a P/E ratio?

A P/E ratio simply stands for the Price to Earnings ratio. You take the price of a stock and divide it by the earnings per share to get some idea of whether a company is expensive or cheap.

shiller1
For example, what is the P/E ratio of Apple?

Currently a single share of Apple stock trades at about $130. The earnings per share (EPS) is $8.35. Divide one by the other and that gives us a P/E ratio of 15.3.

What does 15.3 mean, in this context? That multiple tells us that if you were to buy a share of Apple right now, you’d be paying 15 times the earnings per share for the privilege. Think of it like the price tag of a stock.

The P/E ratio is often used as a point of comparison. The ratio for the broad U.S. stock market is about 26, and all things being equal, it indicates that the overall market is more expensive than a share of Apple alone. You might compare Apple’s P/E ratio to itself, over time, to see whether Apple is cheaper than it has been in the past, or you could compare it to other similar, tech companies to see how the iPhone-making giant stacks up.

shiller2
Source: SeekingAlpha

What is a Shiller P/E ratio?

Take a second to think about what the P/E ratio is. We took the price of a single stock and divided it by the earnings per share.

Typically, the earnings per share (EPS) value uses the earnings over a period of twelve-months. A P/E ratio constructed this way would be called the trailing-twelve month P/E ratio. So if you divided the current share price by the previous year’s EPS then you are getting a sense of how expensive a stock is, in relation to its earnings for the year.

But people like to get creative, and they use all sorts of time-frames for the EPS.

What Shiller did, was extend the time period to 10 years.

Why is it useful?

This chart below shows us the traditional P/E ratio and plots it against the return of the overall U.S. market for the next 12 months.  

shiller3
Source: SeekingAlpha

The scattershot nature of the graph tells us that the traditional P/E ratio doesn’t have any ability to forecast the return of the U.S. equity market.

Shiller found that by going to the 10-year P/E ratio, he was better able to forecast future stock market returns.

shille2
Source: SeekingAlpha

As you can see, there’s a much clearer trend there. The higher the Shiller P/E (CAPE is just another name for it), the lower the return of the market over the next 10-15 years.

The idea is that by looking at earnings over 10 years, you’re able to smooth out any weird fluctuations and get a clearer picture of where the economy is headed because very long-term earnings are correlated with future stock market returns.

Although the Shiller P/E ratio can be an effective tool, it shouldn’t be abused.

This ratio is a good indicator to look at, but it’s important to remember that most investors, analysts and market professionals will not base their decisions to buy and sell on the Shiller P/E ratio alone.

Save

January 2, 2021 Update: We have just announced our BEST STOCK NEWSLETTER of 2020 AWARD!

CLICK HERE to find out which stock newsletter was up 78% in 2020 (and whose 2019 picks are now up 113%).

*** Our Award for BEST STOCK NEWSLETTER of 2020 ALERT ***

Updated January 2, 2021

At WallStreetSurvivor, we subscribe to dozens stock recommendation and advisory newsletters. There is ONE newsletter that is constantly outperforming all of the others--The Motley Fool Stock Advisor.

Five of their 2020 stock picks have doubled and the average return of all 24 of their stock picks for 2020 is up 78%!

We have been tracking ALL of the Motley Fool stock picks since January 2016. That's 5 years and 120 stock picks. As of Friday, January 1, 2021 the Motley Fool's January stock pick (TSLA) is up 720%, their March pick (ZM) is up 172%, their April pick of SHOP is up 226% and their June pick CRWD is up 120%; and another two have more than doubled. In addition, 10 of their 2019, 12 of their 2018, 11 of their 2017, 15 of their 2016. Most impressively, over the last 5 years that we have been tracking every recommendation, their average stock pick is up 209%--tht means over the last 5 years their stock picks, on average, have TRIPLED!

Now no one can guarantee that their next picks will be as strong, but our 5 years of experience has been super-profitable. The important thing about the Fool stock picks is you have to buy them the day they are recommended because they usually pop 5-10% in the first 72 hours after the release their recommendation. You sure don’t want to risk missing out on their next pick.

Normally the Fool service is priced at $199 per year but they are currently offering a NEW SUBSCRIBER DISCOUNT that allows you to get theiir next 24 stock picks for just $99/year. HERE is the LINK to visit their New Subscriber Discount page.

CLICK HERE to get access to all The Motley Fool’s Stock Picks and their next 12 months of picks for just $99 per Year! 



GET UP TO $1,000 IN FREE STOCK

WHEN YOU OPEN A ROBINHOOD BROKERAGE ACCOUNT

Robinhood was the first brokerage site to NOT charge commissions when they opened in 2013. They just past 10,000,000 accounts and to celebrate they are offering up to $1,000 in free stock when you open a new account.

Here’s the details: You must click on a special promo link to open your new Robinhood account. Then when you fund your account with at least $10, you will receive one stock valued between $5 and $500. Then, you will get a link to share with your friends. Every time one of your friends opens an account, you will receive another free stock valued between $5 and $500. Click here to learn more about this Special Robinhood offer.

Claim your free stock NOW (before it’s too late)



One response to “The Shiller P/E Ratio”

  1. Satyajeet says:

    It intuitively make sense that R-squared would go up, if the earnings over 10 years (instead of 1 year) were used in PE ratios.

    But the question is, “Is a single metric like earnings really the best way to judge valuations?” Does it contain all the information that is needed to really understand a complex business?

    Hence, there is a case for looking at more detailed valuation methods such as full-form DCF. They explicitly involve more data points than a simple (simplistic) single-shot valuation metric.